Ohio Code § 903.17
Ohio Code § 903.17. Reproduced from the official Ohio Revised Code, with a citation summary, verification link, and related provisions.
§ 903.17.
(A) The director of agriculture may propose to require corrective actions and assess
a civil penalty against an owner or operator of an animal feeding operation if the
director or the director's authorized representative determines that the owner or
operator is not in compliance with section 903.08 of the Revised Code , the terms and conditions of a NPDES permit, the NPDES provisions of a permit to
operate, or rules adopted under division (E) of section 903.10 of the Revised Code . However, the director may impose a civil penalty only if all of the following occur: (1) The owner or operator is notified in writing of the deficiencies resulting in noncompliance,
the actions that the owner or operator must take to correct the deficiencies, and
the time period within which the owner or operator must correct the deficiencies and
attain compliance. (2) After the time period specified in the notice has elapsed, the director or the director's
duly authorized representative has inspected the animal feeding operation, determined
that the owner or operator is still not in compliance, and issued a notice of violation
to require corrective actions. (3) The director affords the owner or operator an opportunity for an adjudication hearing
under Chapter 119. of the Revised Code to challenge the director's determination that
the owner or operator is not in compliance or the imposition of the civil penalty,
or both. However, the owner or operator may waive the right to an adjudication hearing. (B) If the opportunity for an adjudication hearing is waived or if, after an adjudication
hearing, the director determines that a violation has occurred or is occurring, the
director may issue an order and assess a civil penalty of not more than ten thousand
dollars per violation against the violator. For purposes of determining the civil penalty, each day that a violation continues
constitutes a separate and distinct violation. The order and the assessment of the civil penalty may be appealed in accordance
with section 119.12 of the Revised Code . (C) To the extent consistent with the Federal Water Pollution Control Act, the director
shall consider technical feasibility and economic costs in issuing orders under this
section. (D)(1) The attorney general, upon the written request of the director, shall bring an action
for an injunction in any court of competent jurisdiction against any person violating
or threatening to violate section 903.08 of the Revised Code , the terms and conditions of a NPDES permit, the NPDES provisions of a permit to
operate, rules adopted under division (E) of section 903.10 of the Revised Code , or an order issued under division (B) of this section. (2) In lieu of seeking civil penalties under division (A) of this section, the director
may request, in writing, the attorney general to bring an action for a civil penalty
of not more than ten thousand dollars per violation in a court of competent jurisdiction
against any person that has violated or is violating section 903.08 of the Revised Code , the terms and conditions of a NPDES permit, the NPDES provisions of a permit to
operate, rules adopted under division (E) of section 903.10 of the Revised Code , or an order issued under division (B) of this section. For purposes of determining the civil penalty to be assessed under division (B)
of this section, each day that a violation continues constitutes a separate and distinct
violation. (E) In addition to any other penalties imposed under this section, the director may impose
an administrative penalty against an owner or operator of an animal feeding operation
if the director or the director's authorized representative determines that the owner
or operator has discharged pollutants into waters of the state in violation of section 903.08 of the Revised Code or the terms and conditions of a NPDES permit or the NPDES provisions of the permit
to operate issued for the operation. The administrative penalty shall not exceed five thousand dollars. The director shall afford the owner or operator an opportunity for an adjudication
hearing under Chapter 119. of the Revised Code to challenge the director's determination
under this division, the director's imposition of an administrative penalty under
this division, or both. The director's determination and the imposition of the administrative penalty may
be appealed in accordance with section 119.12 of the Revised Code .
Source: official Ohio text · Last verified 2026-08-27
At a glance
- Citation: Ohio Revised Code § 903.17
- Jurisdiction: Ohio
- Code: Ohio Revised Code
- Text: transcribed from the official source (verify below)
Verify the text
Statute text is transcribed from the official Ohio Revised Code. Confirm it against the primary source before relying on it:
Not legal advice. Verify against the official source and consult a licensed Ohio attorney.
Common questions
What is the source of Ohio Revised Code § 903.17?
The text above is transcribed from the Ohio Revised Code, the codified statutes of Ohio. The official publisher link appears under "Verify the text" on this page.
What subject does Ohio Revised Code § 903.17 address?
It addresses the rule set out in the section text. Read the section together with the surrounding provisions listed under "Nearby provisions" for the full picture.
Is Ohio Revised Code § 903.17 still in force?
Statutes are amended, repealed, and renumbered every session. Confirm the current version at the official Ohio source before relying on this text.
Can this page be used as legal advice?
No. This is a reference transcription for research. Applying Ohio law to your facts requires a licensed Ohio attorney who can review the specifics.